Original catalogue analysis

Source coverage and evidence completeness.

This snapshot examines the distribution of source hosts and whether core evidence fields are populated. It does not score source quality or independently verify reported outcomes.

Tactic entries
2,042

Current catalogue snapshot used for this report.

Distinct source hosts
333

Hostnames found in linked source URLs; subdomains are counted separately.

Core fields populated
1,754 / 2,042

Requires a tactic title, descriptions, example, channel, source name and URL, and metric field.

Most represented source hosts

Source hostEntriesShare of catalogue
reddit.com23511.5%
intercom.com1065.2%
producthunt.com743.6%
linear.app673.3%
buffer.com542.6%
ahrefs.com522.5%
productlane.com492.4%
newsletter.posthog.com402.0%
indiehackers.com402.0%
linkedin.com351.7%
docs.github.com351.7%
developer.apple.com331.6%
developers.google.com321.6%
learn.microsoft.com301.5%
read.first1000.co251.2%
meta.discourse.org241.2%
docs.zapier.com231.1%
developer.chrome.com221.1%
wovly.ai211.0%
arxiv.org201.0%

Shares use tactic entries as the denominator. A tactic links to one recorded primary source in this report; host concentration is not a source-quality judgment.

Evidence fields checked

Core fields checked: tactic title, one-line description, rationale, company example, channel tags, source name, source URL, and reported metric. Missing-field counts should be treated as a data-quality prompt, not proof of claim accuracy.

Read the full methodology ยท Browse the source-backed catalogue